I think that when it comes to learning a language and typical schools, classes, coursebooks, exercises, instruction, tests et al. – we’ve got it all wrong. Let me explain.
Research points to two different “ways” to learn a language.
The more traditional and direct approach is what is supported in the realm of most schooling and especially subject teaching. “Class today we are going to learn …. (add you topic/grammar point/vocabulary theme, skill etc ..). What we might call, “explicit” learning and teaching – deductivism at its best. Teachers teach a “language objective”, use academic terminology and have students practice drills and examples. In this way, students slowly in memory build up a vocabulary and learn the language.
The less often used and more indirect approach is focused on just communicating and interacting with messages that we want to hear and understand. What we might call “implicit” learning and teaching – inductivism at its best. Teachers don’t “give away the ghost” before getting started. The students just use the language to communicate, do tasks, experience the world of language and in this interaction with language they acquire language.
Which is best? If you go by the numbers – explicit teaching wins hands down. But I go for the latter. Let me tell you why.
2. It works. Geoffrey Jordan has a nice synthesis of the research supporting students learning a language through implicit instruction. I also highly recommend this accessible and must read article about best practices for language teaching and how they relate to current research. There is even evidence that students that begin learning language through explicit instruction may be inhibiting their own natural ability to learn language.
Imagine a classroom where students were busy discussing, speaking, wondering, investigating, interacting socially and not learning a language but USING the language. We lose so much of that in our curriculums – that language is a means to an end – not the end itself.
I think of this wonderful quote.
We have too much struggle, too much trying in our classrooms. Getting a grade, mastering X, remembering Y. We need less of this to) get more language learning happening. We truly do.
I wish I could propose task based learning and teaching (TBLT) or communicative language teaching (CLT). For years I flew their flag over my beliefs and still do to som degree. However, they’ve been hijacked by big business and global publishers. Even by the new burgeoning Ed Tech platforms with their online tutors and self-study quizzes. Nope.
I propose only three simple things teachers should do in their lessons (and which are really one – allowing students to use the language).
I just got home after an absolutely stunning day with my preservice teachers class. This year, I’m again using an…
Reading is a research supported activity beneficial for student learning - a language or acquiring knowledge.…
A story. Two teachers visit the principal's office to get their new class assignment for the school year. The…
Never miss a thing! Subscribe. We'll never spam you!
All the "buzz", news, products, people, resources related to English language teaching
Leave a Reply