I’ve always been a big advocate of continued reflection by teachers, especially regarding their own beliefs vis a vis teaching and learning. Especially the continued development of one’s philosophy of education.
I don’t think we pay or give much attention to this in teacher training programs. Many teachers don’t create their own system but are many times ruled by another’s (to paraphrase Blake). Too often teachers just adopt a certain belief system – be it that of their textbook (say Gass & Selinker), their TEFL trainer, the CELTA or even just remaining mired in their own belief system created and ruled by 1,000s of hours sitting in class – how they were taught.
In my teacher training, I’ve often given teachers this short questionnaire and then got them discussing their fundamental beliefs about being a teacher and teaching. I’ve yet to do the same regarding teaching and learning a language (save for my reflective journal – Zen and the Act of Teaching which kind of does so) but I think our profession needs to develop a platform to do so.
So today while listening to Erdogan detail the crimes of the rich and mighty regarding Khashoggi – I tapped out these statements. Which do you believe as true? Which do you fundamentally disagree with?
They are a rough copy and maybe a lot of them aren’t phrased well enough, clear enough, but it’s a start. Later, I’d like to comment on each and add references to each detailing research that proves or disproves. So stay tuned.
But here are the statements. What do you believe? Which are true? Which are in the realm of myth? Comments appreciated.
Download this list as a handout here.
You could add: * Non-native speakers know grammar better than native speakers. This can be narrowed to teachers of English.
* You can never learn an additional language perfectly if you start after age ___ (fill in a year).
* Some languages are innately more difficult (to learn) than others.
* No one owns English.
* Different people learn better using different styles because they have different natural ways of learning.
* (Related to the previous belief) Teachers should vary their teaching methods to accommodate the different learning styles.
* Deductive teaching is more effective than inductive. / Inductive teaching is more effective than deductive.
Yes, that first one is a good one. It comes out often and people just swallow it. We should clue in to really being skeptical when statements are so broad sweeping. Not so sure about the some languages more difficult – seems to be true but differs on your L1. But yes, so many other factors enter in there. Also, I do think with languages inductive teaching is better … but yes, got to define “effective” – what is the measurement?
Teachers by training or usually just instinct, know that music works in the classroom. For all ages, for all topics.…
Video has become a dominant material in our language learning classrooms. It is the "new" textbook. Part of the…
Today, went out for a nice bike ride with "my old man". He's over 70 and he kicked my butt! Truly. I'll admit I'm not…
The Internet is vast! Help us find great content!
SubmitNever miss a thing! Subscribe. We'll never spam you!
All the "buzz", news, products, people, resources related to English language teaching
Kim Dammers
“Students prefer native speakers as teachers.” – This certainly varies from student to student. Many students who have had a few years of English with NNESTs are afraid of interacting with NESTs and will definitely avoid them. On the other hand, many students prefer a native speakers and will pay a premium to have a native speaker teach them.